Probability of approval · v1
GSK bepirovirsen
Chronic hepatitis B · NDA
Of 100 applications in this same position, about 94 get approved.
Summary
We put approval of GSK's bepirovirsen for chronic hepatitis B at 94%, in line with the ~95% base rate for big-pharma applications. GSK is the sponsor; Ionis is the licensor. Two replicate Phase 3 trials (B-Well 1/2, about 1,800 patients) met their primary endpoint on the field's preferred endpoint: functional cure in 19% versus 0% on placebo. The drug has Breakthrough designation and priority review, and no advisory committee has been called. Remaining risks: ALT flares in about a quarter of patients, reversible platelet and kidney-function drops that will need monitoring, and manufacturing sites we cannot see. Confidence is high.
Recorded · v1Proof ↓
Evidence · 6 items
Why it stays close to 95%
Indication
Chronic hepatitis B in adults; 6-month finite subcutaneous antisense oligonucleotide course aimed at functional cure (Phase 3 B-Well 1/2 population: nucleos(t)ide-analogue-treated, baseline HBsAg <=3000 IU/mL)
95% of comparable applications were approved in the past: the opponent every forecast has to beat. Below are the reasons this forecast stays close to it.
▲ supports approval, ▼ counts against it. More squares, more weight.
01▲ SupportsSmall Big-pharma sponsor and original NDA, not a resubmission
GSK, not Ionis, is the NDA holder and runs all regulatory work. Drugs@FDA shows no prior action on bepirovirsen. The right anchor is the big-pharma base rate (about 95%), not the 76% small/mid-company rate.
Source: Ionis 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 (GSK responsible for all global development and regulatory activity); GSK press release 2026-04-28
02▲ SupportsSmall Two replicate, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials met their primary endpoint with a very large contrast, on an endpoint regulators have endorsed
In the pooled B-Well 1/2 data (about 1,830 patients), functional cure reached 19% on bepirovirsen (233/1,220) versus 0% on placebo (0/614), p<0.001. Each trial was positive on its own (20% and 19%). In the HBsAg <=1000 IU/mL stratum, the key secondary endpoint, the rate was 26% (200/768) versus 0/393. Results were published in NEJM. Functional cure (sustained HBsAg loss with HBV DNA <LLOQ 24 weeks off treatment) is the preferred primary endpoint in the 2022 AASLD-EASL treatment-endpoints guidance, which was written with regulators taking part. The step is small only because the base rate already assumes a clean package.
Source: GSK EASL 2026 press release (via NATAP); BioPharma Dive 2026-05-28; J Hepatol 2023 AASLD-EASL endpoints report
03▲ SupportsSmall Breakthrough Therapy designation, Fast Track and Priority Review
The FDA granted BTD when it accepted the NDA for priority review, with an FDA-assigned PDUFA date of 26 October 2026. GSK's Q2 report (28 July 2026) says the review is ongoing and that a decision is expected by that date. No problems have been disclosed.
Source: GSK press release 2026-04-28; GSK 6-K Q2 2026 results filed 2026-07-28
04▼ AgainstSmall Safety burden typical of antisense oligonucleotides: hepatic flares, platelet and kidney-function drops
During treatment, ALT rose to >=3x ULN in 24% of patients and to grade 3 in 6%. These rises are read as immune-mediated clearance flares. Platelet counts and eGFR fell in a reversible, treatment-dependent way. Injection-site reactions were the most common adverse event. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 16%, and trial monitoring was every 1-2 weeks. This points to warnings and monitoring requirements in the label, or possibly a REMS, more than to a CRL. No deaths or discontinuation signals were reported.
Source: ACG Evidence-Based GI review, August 2026 (gi.org); BioPharma Dive 2026-05-28
05▼ AgainstSmall First-in-class antisense drug for an infectious disease, made by contract manufacturers we cannot see
Oligonucleotide synthesis is mature, and GSK has a strong record. Public sources do not name the drug-substance or fill-finish sites, so inspection risk cannot be checked directly. No 483s or warning letters have been linked to this product.
Source: No public manufacturing disclosure found; GSK and Ionis filings as of 2026-10-04
06▲ SupportsSmall No advisory committee about three weeks before the PDUFA date
No Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee meeting is listed for bepirovirsen. The only human-drug AdComs announced for October 2026 concern other products. This fits a review the FDA considers routine.
Source: FDA advisory committee calendar / search, 2026-10-04
What would change this forecast
- 01
GSK discloses a CRL, a major amendment (a 3-month extension would only move the date), or a facility inspection problem
- 02
The FDA asks for a REMS or more safety data on hepatic flares, thrombocytopenia or renal effects late in the review
- 03
Reports of FDA staffing disruption that cause a missed goal date (that would delay the resolution, not count as NO)
Any change is published as a new version; earlier versions stay exactly as they were.
Confidence
High
Manufacturing and inspection risk
Low
This is a synthetic oligonucleotide made by an experienced big-pharma sponsor, and no inspection problems have been disclosed. The sites are not public, so the residual risk is unknown rather than zero. Big-pharma CRLs in 2024-26 were mostly about facilities, which is the main route to a NO here.
Record · version 1
Written on 2026-10-04, 22 days before the PDUFA target date.
Timeline
Fingerprint
SHA-25650fc299752211411f6cbbe2626ab9e32556b4b54b5ac4018806f0718d4344368
The fingerprint of the v1 file. It is what the timestamp commits to: change one character of the file and the fingerprint no longer matches.
Verify it yourself
- Download the JSON file above and the .ots file of the same name into one folder.
- Compute the SHA-256 of the file. It should match the fingerprint above.
- Verify with OpenTimestamps. Once the timestamp is in a Bitcoin block, ots verify reports the block time if you run a Bitcoin node; without one, drop both files on the verifier at opentimestamps.org, or run ots info to see the block height and look it up in any block explorer. If the block time is before the FDA’s decision, the file cannot have been written afterwards.
pip install opentimestamps-client
shasum -a 256 v1_20261004T195758Z.json
ots verify v1_20261004T195758Z.json.ots
ots info v1_20261004T195758Z.json.ots
Scoring rule
What is scored is the last version recorded at least 2 days before the PDUFA target date; if the FDA decides early, only versions recorded before the day of its decision count. For this forecast the cutoff is 2026-10-24. Its error (also called the Brier score) is the squared distance between the forecast and the outcome, set against the error of quoting the base rate only.
Two outcomes, two scores
If approved
Forecast 94%→error .004
Base rate only 95%→error .003
The base rate is closer
If not approved (CRL)
Forecast 94%→error .884
Base rate only 95%→error .902
The forecast is closer
Error = (forecast probability − outcome)². Approved counts as 1, not approved as 0. Lower is better.
Sources · 9
- 01gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/bepirovirsen-accepted-for-priority-review-and-granted-breakthrough-therapy-designation-by-the-us-fda/
2026-04-28; FDA-assigned PDUFA 26 Oct 2026, BTD
- 02sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1131399/000165495426006949/a1493o.htm
GSK 6-K, Q2 2026 results, 2026-07-28: review ongoing, decision expected by 26 Oct 2026
- 03sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/874015/000087401526000251/form10q.htm
Ionis 10-Q filed 2026-07-29: GSK responsible for regulatory; Priority Review, PDUFA 2026-10-26; $35M milestone on approval
- 04
SEC 8-Ks filed by Ionis 2026-09-04 and 2026-09-23 (no bepirovirsen regulatory change disclosed)
- 05natap.org/2026/EASL/EASL_17.htm
GSK EASL 2026 release: pooled 19% vs 0% functional cure; 26% in HBsAg <=1000
- 06
- 07gi.org/journals-publications/ebgi/kwo_aug2026/
ACG EBGI review, August 2026: ALT flares, platelet/eGFR effects
- 08sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168827823004178
2022 AASLD-EASL HBV treatment endpoints conference report
- 09